As of 2026-09-25As of 2026-09-25
  • SPXS&P 5007,743.41+0.51%
  • NDXNasdaq Composite27,068.72+0.48%
  • US10Y10Y Treasury5.18%+1.37%
  • US2Y2Y Treasury4.87%+0.41%
  • DXYDollar index119.51+0.14%
  • WTICrude oil96.41−0.58%
  • VIXVolatility14.21−4.44%
All writing

JPMorgan: what scale buys you in banking

A fortress balance sheet is a slogan until you look at the technology budget. I try to separate the cyclical earnings from the structural ones and ask what a normal return on tangible equity looks like.

Sample note. Numbers are illustrative placeholders, not live data.

Framing

Banks are hard to value because their earnings are a function of the rate cycle as much as of management. The exercise here is to strip out the cyclical part and see what is left.

Structural versus cyclical

Line Cyclical Structural
Net interest income Rates, deposit betas Deposit franchise
Investment banking fees Deal cycle Market share gains
Card and payments Consumer credit Network scale
Technology spend — $17B+ annual budget

The number I anchor on

A through-the-cycle return on tangible common equity in the high teens supports a price-to-tangible-book well above peers. The question is whether that gap is the right size.

Risks

  • Regulatory capital rules changing the denominator
  • Credit normalization in cards
  • A prolonged flat curve compressing net interest income

Educational content only. Not investment advice.